|
created by Sandra Gardiner email: sandragardiner@yahoo.com.au http://www.web-and-flow.com/members/sgardine/driving10/webquest.htm |
| RUBRIC | Head-on Collision | Spin-out at the Round-a-bout | Road Aware |
| Individual Expertise | Little more was done than to copy and paste from Web pages. Not too much seemed to get into the brain. No evidence of having formed own opinion, happy to accept what others say. | Clear learning on the topic has taken place. There's an ability to discuss the topic using examples or evidence. Still some confusion on the tough issues. | New information has been firmly connected to previous related knowledge. An easy use of evidence shows a sound understanding. |
| Group Synthesis | A poorly structured reposnse - a we'll take this from here and that from there approach. Ideas are thrown together, with little attempt at sequencing a logical discussion. | The group decision is based on clear understanding of key issues and works to balance them. Some weak spot may still exist on those issues that are extremely controversial. | This group decision is soundly reasoned and addresses key issues that make the topic a challenge to come to terms with. Also addresses controversial side issues with maturity and clarity. |
| Final Outcome | The final work seems rushed or incomplete. Careless errors may confuse the audience. This group's response it not forwarded to any of the real world stakeholders. | Care has been taken to create a finished product. Few errors exist and these wouldn't be confusing. Answer forwarded to the real world key stakeholders. | Care and creativity make this an interesting and polished final work. The quality of the ideas is reflected in the product. Has demonstrated some initiative to reach other real world people for a response to their letter. |
|
|
created by Sandra Gardiner email: sandragardiner@yahoo.com.au http://www.web-and-flow.com/members/sgardine/driving10/webquest.htm |